Is there anything about Duck that you wanted to say but didn't have a chance to in class today? Say it here. Cite some text to support your claims.
Deadline: start of class Wednesday (11/4).
Monday, November 2, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Duck seems to speak from a very misogynistic viewpoint. I wonder what Queen Caroline, the woman who provided him with all of his monetary resources, would have thought about this poem. How did Duck get away with writing this poem even though he was funded by a female?
Good question! Short answer: class trumps gender. Queen Anne (and other upper-class women readers, including the wife of Rev. Stanley, who asked him to write the poem) probably would not have seen any connection between Duck's disparaging remarks about the haymakers and themselves as women.
It is interesting how Duck presents laborers as Roman Gods heading into the battle field where their superhuman strength will endure the pain that the sun lovingly provides. However, the text undermines this parallel illusion. The laborers are always under the command of the "master". The laborers may have the power that surpasses Hercules', but the master controls the power that the laborers possess. For example, "Before our master call us forth again; / And says, "For harvest yourselves prepare; / The ripened harvest now demands your care. / Get all things ready, and be quickly drest; / Early morn I shall disturb your rest"(698). The master demands the workers like slaves when he should treating them as free individuals. It is also interesting how the laborers remain, knowingly, under the tyranny of the master, who seductively beguiles the workers into his world. The laborers, unfortunately, are incapable of ever escaping.
I was really interested by what came up in class about how there is not a cycle of birth and death, rather just death over and over again. But in the end of the poem Duck refers to "the year's revolving course (Line 281)." I was curious as to how any of his readers found this sad life that he portrays as wonderful literature. Is this because his audience is of the middle class and finds solitude in this complaining poem? It's so incredibly melodramatic, I don't see how he can be taken so seriously especially by the queen, as ruler over the working class.
Post a Comment